0%
100%
So Barack Obama got the Nobel Peace Prize. I must admit it came as a shock, even to me. After all, where are his results? How can I measure his performance against his ’objectives’? Did he meet his 4-year target? Surely he shouldn’t have a prize if he didn’t meet his target yet? So was it a good decision? Yes, I do think so, although I find it sad when I realise I’m quite alone to think that.
In a World
obsessed by performance, results and efficiency, it is not difficult
to see why this prize has quickly become disturbing for many. But
think about it, the Nobel Prize’s goal is to acknowledge a significant
contribution to Peace by an individual or an organisation. Mr Obama
didn’t achieve many ’hard’ results yet but one has to acknowledge the
dramatic changes that have already happened in the past few months: a
return to
multilateral policies; a commitment to fight climate change; a more
balanced position in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict; and a quite
surprising pledge for a World without nuclear weapons - which by the
way gives more credibility and weight to the West’s diplomacy in the
Iran nuclear crisis. Mr Obama’s positions are also helping to
relieve some of the resentment felt in the developing World against the
West and the USA in particular. Doing so in 9 months after 8 years of
George W Bush’s leadership is by itself remarkable. But is it enough?
Would it have been enough if anybody else had done the same? Probably
not.
However
the
truth is that Mr Obama is not anybody, he is leading the sole World
Superpower. This means his words and commitments in the
areas I cited
before have more impact towards stability and peace than, say, tangible
actions from the UK or France. After all, a sneeze of fear made the USA leadership send young men and women in Irak.
If a sneeze from Mr Bush can create a war, why not accept the idea that
words from Mr Obama can indeed promote Peace?
Mr
Obama’s words are giving hope to millions of people around the World,
because everyone knows that major issues just cannot be sorted out
without the support of the US leadership. It’s Mr Obama’s vision that
has been awarded the Nobel Prize. Although results are indeed what
counts in the end, the right vision is always the starting point to any
real change. Hyper-obsession with
results and performance without vision left us with a cynical World
without dreams and hope, a World suddenly fragile and fearful,
protecting short term individual interests, a World that has
effectively become more
dangerous. Vision changes minds, brings people together around a common
project,
common objectives, and gives them real hope. Setting the right vision
has to be the first step towards any decisive societal transformation,
because
real transformation cannot be achieved without people’s understanding
and involvement. Mr Obama’s vision is not a breakthrough, it is not
original, but the difference is that he has the power to realise it in
the years to come. This is a unique position, and this is why he should
be encouraged for it.
The Nobel Prize was awarded to encourage the President in his difficult and courageous - particularly in his own country - diplomatic turnaround. Yes, results will have to come, but judging by the somewhat cynical criticism read in the papers it feels the Prize and its encouragement couldn’t be more timely for a man who’s increasingly alone. Alone because he’s the only one to fully acknowledge the immense power of dreams.
Pour réagir, identifiez-vous avec votre login /mot de passe
Si vous n'avez pas de login / mot de passe, vous devez vous inscrire ici.